| Páginas sobre el tema: [1 2] > | Poll: Which Translation Memory System do you like best? Autor de la hebra: ProZ.com Staff
|
|---|
This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Which Translation Memory System do you like best?".
This poll was originally submitted by Marinus Vesseur
View the poll here
A forum topic will appear each time a new poll is run. For more info... See more This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Which Translation Memory System do you like best?".
This poll was originally submitted by Marinus Vesseur
View the poll here
A forum topic will appear each time a new poll is run. For more information, see: http://proz.com/topic/33629 ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Wordfast: best cost-value return | Nov 15, 2006 |
Not that I have a lot of experience when it comes to CAT tools, but what little experience I do have leans in favor of Wordfast.
First, it is FREE to download. It is not some whole complex mega-program suite, but a simple unit that conveniently runs on top of Microsoft Word. Yet for all its simplicity, its complex capabilities should not be underestimated.
It is versatile, helping in the translation of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other documents.
It is ea... See more Not that I have a lot of experience when it comes to CAT tools, but what little experience I do have leans in favor of Wordfast.
First, it is FREE to download. It is not some whole complex mega-program suite, but a simple unit that conveniently runs on top of Microsoft Word. Yet for all its simplicity, its complex capabilities should not be underestimated.
It is versatile, helping in the translation of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other documents.
It is easy to learn, easy to use. I was ready to translate after reading the downloadable user guide for 10 minutes.
There is a healthy Wordfast discussion forum to answer any and all problems one could encounter with Wordfast. As well, it is a program in development, meaning that newer versions readily adapt to pressing needs in the translation field.
I'm sure there is much more to say about it. But to sum my position up, I am very happy with Wordfast as it has greatly increased my productivity and translation fidelity . And unless someone gives me very pressing reasons to the contrary, I do not intend to spend hundreds of dollars for some other CAT tool when I have one that works very well, and is FREE. ▲ Collapse
| | | | Angela Dickson (X) 
Reino Unido
Local time: 02:26
francés al inglés
+ ...
haven't we had this poll before? and wasn't the conclusion then the same as is likely this time - that few people have used all the tools so few people are in a position to make a meaningful comparison.
I use Trados and get on pretty well with it, so have chosen Trados - I find it behaves better than Wordfast, though it could be that I didn't persevere well enough with Wordfast.
| | | | | Trados... but! | Nov 15, 2006 |
I chose Trados because it's the one I use the most. It's not about liking it best, it's rather about being forced to use it - most clients who request the use of a CAT tool want Trados. I've used SDLX before but not enough to be as productive with it as I am with Trados. I will look into it though - compatibility is not really an issue anymore, so I may want to switch to it...
I tried Across lately and it seems like a good one - but there were some glitches and customer service for ... See more I chose Trados because it's the one I use the most. It's not about liking it best, it's rather about being forced to use it - most clients who request the use of a CAT tool want Trados. I've used SDLX before but not enough to be as productive with it as I am with Trados. I will look into it though - compatibility is not really an issue anymore, so I may want to switch to it...
I tried Across lately and it seems like a good one - but there were some glitches and customer service for that product seems to be practically non existent. Nobody came back to me yet! Also, they say that the client version of it is free for freelancers, but I've never received confirmation yet that I have the full license for that version. So, although it looks great as a CAT tool, they are not doing anything to win the favor of freelancers, in my opinion. Let'S leave it at that now, shall we?
Had I tried all of the proposed choices, I would be able to better tell you which one I prefer. Unfortunately, they all involve a learning curve and I don't have time to learn to use software I may never buy/implement. But I am willing to hear what you have to say ▲ Collapse
| | |
|
|
|
| Yes, you're right ..... | Nov 15, 2006 |
Angela Dickson wrote:
haven't we had this poll before? and wasn't the conclusion then the same as is likely this time - that few people have used all the tools so few people are in a position to make a meaningful comparison.
I use Trados and get on pretty well with it, so have chosen Trados - I find it behaves better than Wordfast, though it could be that I didn't persevere well enough with Wordfast.
| | | | | Easy to learn | Nov 15, 2006 |
I chose wordfast, only having experience with Trados and Wordfast.
Apart from the major difference in price, I found the Trados manual totally unintelligible so I only learnt to use its very basic functions, whereas the wordfast manual is very clear and easy to follow and I am able to do a lot more with it.
| | | | | Heartsome Xliff Translation Editor | Nov 15, 2006 |
As a Linux user I am limited, as not many CAt tools producers offer their software for OS other, than Windows.
Anni
| | | | shasas
Alemania
Local time: 03:26
inglés al alemán
My brain
| | |
|
|
|
Williamson
Reino Unido
Local time: 02:26
flamenco al inglés
+ ...
I prefer Déjà Vu. More intuitive and simpler to use. Did not impose a price reduction scheme for matches, fuzzies etc.
Trados gradually be phased out. And so will their reduction scheme (hopefully).
Now it is Sdlx-Trados, but by 2008 only Sdlx will remain?
| | | | esperantisto
Local time: 04:26
Miembro 2006
inglés al ruso
+ ...
LOCALIZADOR DEL SITIO | Where's OmegaT? | Nov 15, 2006 |
Indeed, why isn't OmegaT in the list? It's free and open-source, multiplatform, small, easy to use. Yes, it lacks many features of Trados or DejaVu, but for my needs it's OK. I find Trados and WordFast too Word-centered, and DejaVu too difficult to learn.
| | | | | I chose DV, but I have to use Trados | Nov 15, 2006 |
Among the tools I have used, the one I iked best was DV, followed by TM/2 and SDLX.
I use Trados all the time since it is required by most of my customers, and I know how to use it very well.
Unfortunately, the more I use it, the more I am convinced that it is a very badly programmed piece of junk, and that it relies overmuch on another piece of bloated software (MS Word - which is often a co-culprit when Trados has a problem).
| | | | |
|
|
|
| missing option | Nov 15, 2006 |
There a missing option in this poll: NONE OF THE ABOVE (or just NONE).
Should be consider OTHER that option?
| | | | Mark Nathan
Francia
Local time: 03:26
Miembro 2002
francés al inglés
+ ...
| Wordfast - Trados | Nov 15, 2006 |
I've been using the free version of Wordfast for about a year in order to be able to send uncleaned files. This has been at the request of an increasing number of agencies, who seem to accept Wordfast files because they are compatible with Trados.
It is quite rare that it genuinely speeds things up, but I am getting attached to being able to view the source text at all times.
Rather then buy a licence for Wordfast, it seems more sensible to bite the bullet and buy Trados, but... See more I've been using the free version of Wordfast for about a year in order to be able to send uncleaned files. This has been at the request of an increasing number of agencies, who seem to accept Wordfast files because they are compatible with Trados.
It is quite rare that it genuinely speeds things up, but I am getting attached to being able to view the source text at all times.
Rather then buy a licence for Wordfast, it seems more sensible to bite the bullet and buy Trados, but I keep getting put off by remarks about how unnecessarily complicated it is, and how it will probably be superceded by something else. Buying a licence for Wordfast seems a bit of a half measure.
I know we've had a similar forum before, but this one is slightly different and I welcome anything that might help me make a decision. ▲ Collapse
| | | | Özden Arıkan
Alemania
Local time: 03:26
inglés al turco
+ ...
| How would you like your memory? | Nov 15, 2006 |
Like is not the best word, methinks.... I chose Wordfast, because I like it best, but I use Trados.
By the way, I know, you didn't ask, but just for the record: I dislike Transit best
| | | | | Páginas sobre el tema: [1 2] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Poll: Which Translation Memory System do you like best? | Trados Business Manager Lite | Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio
Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business.
More info » |
| | TM-Town | Manage your TMs and Terms ... and boost your translation business
Are you ready for something fresh in the industry? TM-Town is a unique new site for you -- the freelance translator -- to store, manage and share translation memories (TMs) and glossaries...and potentially meet new clients on the basis of your prior work.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
