Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

without liability to you

English answer:

without any duty to compensate you in any way

Added to glossary by Alla_K
Apr 23, 2015 19:42
9 yrs ago
72 viewers *
English term

without liability to you

English Law/Patents Law: Contract(s) terms of service
To the extent permitted by applicable law, Bell may, in its
discretion and **without liability to you**, enter onto your property and inspect, maintain, repair, relocate or replace any Bell
Equipment as needed.

Discussion

Alla_K (asker) Apr 23, 2015:
@ George: No confidential info is disclosed. The agreement is open and can be easily found online. The name of the customer is not disclosed.
George Rabel Apr 23, 2015:
Just a friendly reminder about the rules
Care should be taken not to disclose confidential information in KudoZ postings. In most cases, client names should not be disclosed in a KudoZ posting. Consideration should also be given to whether the term or context would disclose confidential information by its nature.

Responses

+3
1 hr
Selected

without any duty to compensate you in any way

It means that Bell can enter the property for the specific purposes, but that the occupier is not entitled to any compensation or payment from Bell - the occupier has simply to accept it
Peer comment(s):

agree Charles Davis : Yes
1 hr
thanks
agree Tina Vonhof (X)
18 hrs
thanks
agree Phong Le
5 days
thanks
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you!"
+2
4 mins

without your incurring any cost whatsoever

that's the meaning

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 mins (2015-04-23 19:47:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

they can come onto your property and repair, check etc. but you won't have to pay a cent

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2015-04-23 19:48:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

and indeed without your having any legal responsibility

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 mins (2015-04-23 19:49:39 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

it really covers both aspects
Peer comment(s):

agree Patricia Fierro, M. Sc.
31 mins
thanks Patricia
neutral AllegroTrans : but in what circumstances would an occupier incur any cost?
1 hr
unlikely I agree but you never know ... it's more about legal responsibilty
agree Tushar Deep
12 hrs
Something went wrong...
21 hrs

without being legally obligated or accountable to you

Generally, liability means that a legal obligation is created. Usually, this involves a legal remedy. So if there is no liability to you, you have no remedy for Bell entering your property. Another, more specific, definition of liability is pecuniary obligation.
Something went wrong...
4 days

Without any recourse to you for any consequences of us entering your property.

Without Liability is a broader term than cost. Recourse is a better explanation of liability "in this sentence", because it is relating to entering a property. When entering a property there are a lot of criminal laws, litigation laws and common laws and these all of these laws can carry consequences to the a property owner, the landlord, the lease holder, the mortgage stake holders as well as the contractors and employees entering the property, so letting someone in could incur more than costs. Recourse means no actions in any way or by any means against you or any of the other stakeholders in the property if you allow them to enter the property.
Example sentence:

We can instal without recourse to you or your business if we fit our machine on your roof

Something went wrong...

Reference comments

2 hrs
Reference:

A's liability to B is A's responsibility to compensate B

So Bell can do this without liability to you it means you have no claim against Bell for damages.

Provisions of this kind are very common. Here's one on the British Museum's website:

"We reserve the right at our discretion to alter our advertised arrangements for the exhibition, cancel any exhibition time slot and/or close the exhibition without notice; AND in any such event (a) We shall not be liable to you for any loss of business, revenue, profits, anticipated savings or goodwill (whether direct or indirect) or for any indirect, special or consequential loss of any kind and in each case howsoever arising, even if you have advised us of the possibility of same; and (b) our maximum liability to you shall not exceed the total amount you paid for your ticket(s)."
[...]
We have the right, <>without liability to you, to refuse to allow you to enter the exhibition and/or escort you from our premises if you, in our judgment, breach any of these conditions."
https://www.britishmuseum.org/about_this_site/terms_of_use/t...

So if Bell enters your property like this, it's no use trying to sue them for damages. They are not liable to you.
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree AllegroTrans : Yes, but I don't understand how you have time out from actual translating to research and post all these extremely useful and erudite explanations
14 mins
Well, just a quick one before bed does no harm..
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search