Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
valores sorteables
English translation:
securities <assigned/allocated> by drawing
Added to glossary by
Michael Powers (PhD)
Dec 29, 2008 19:26
15 yrs ago
Spanish term
United States
US Court Cert. 1980 Ph.D. 1981
Native in: English
Works in: Spanish to English, Portuguese to English, English to Spanish, and 2 more.
valores sorteables
Spanish to English
Bus/Financial
Finance (general)
Los valores sorteables podrán custodiarse ordenados por especies; el banco repartirá entre los depositarios los valores sorteables, utilizando para el sub-sorteo un método que ganrantice a a todos los depositantes las mismas posibilidades a ser considerados como en el primer sorteo.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | securities <assigned/allocated> by drawing |
Biling Services
|
| 3 +1 | securities subject to allocation by lot |
Paul Merriam
|
Change log
Dec 29, 2008 19:40: Paul Merriam changed "Language pair" from "English to Spanish" to "Spanish to English"
Proposed translations
+2
28 mins
Biling Services
Colombia
Colombia
Native in Spanish
&
English
Specializes in field
Colombia
Specialized, accurate, and timely
Native in: Spanish 
, English
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
8
Selected
securities <assigned/allocated> by drawing
En español, sorteo se refiere a una rifa ("raffle") o juego de azar. No está asociado a "sort" en inglés, que se refiere a ordenamiento o clasificación.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you Biling and Paul - Mike :)"
+1
13 mins
Paul Merriam
Native in English
Works in field
Years of experience
Native in: English
Works in: Russian to English, Polish to English, German to English, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
24
securities subject to allocation by lot
Apparently this particular set of securities has more demand than can be accomodated. Hence there is an allocation by lot (sorteo) to distribute them. I suspect the sub-sorteo is a mechanism to allocate the securities for which the "winner" of the first allocation chose not to accept.
Something went wrong...