Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Japanese term or phrase:
完全支配関係
English translation:
full controlling interest
Added to glossary by
Harry Oikawa
May 25, 2012 08:55
11 yrs ago
2 viewers *
Japanese term
BA (Hons) Spanish and Japanese
Native in: English
Works in: Spanish to English, Japanese to English, French to English, and 1 more.
完全支配関係
Japanese to English
Bus/Financial
Law: Taxation & Customs
Hi,
I came across the term in a tax form and found the definition below. Is there an equivalent term in English?
完全支配関係とは、「一方の法人が他方の法人の発行済株式又は出資（次に掲げる株式又は出資を除く。次項及び第三項において同じ。）の全部を直接又は間接に保有する関係」だ。
Thanks in advance
I came across the term in a tax form and found the definition below. Is there an equivalent term in English?
完全支配関係とは、「一方の法人が他方の法人の発行済株式又は出資（次に掲げる株式又は出資を除く。次項及び第三項において同じ。）の全部を直接又は間接に保有する関係」だ。
Thanks in advance
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | full controlling interest |
Harry Oikawa
|
| 3 | full ownership / wholly owned subsidiary |
Nathan Takase
|
| 3 | Full ownership of a subsidiary |
T.B.
|
| 1 | complete controlling relationship |
cinefil
|
Change log
May 29, 2012 10:56: Harry Oikawa Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+2
15 mins
Harry Oikawa
Native in Japanese
Works in field
Business Communication Expert
Native in: Japanese 
Works in: English to Japanese, Japanese to English
Related KudoZ points
:
8
Selected
full controlling interest
Please see the referense below.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks"
21 mins
Nathan Takase
Native in English
Japanese-English Language Professional
Native in: English (Variant: US)
Works in: Japanese to English, English to Japanese, Japanese, and 1 more.
full ownership / wholly owned subsidiary
Here are a couple more terms that you might need to make use of depending on your source text. The "parent company" has "full ownership" of another company, which would then be a "wholly owned subsidiary." Hope that helps.
1 hr
Full ownership of a subsidiary
Another idea. This English will correspond to the Japanese term.
17 hrs
Something went wrong...