14:10 Dec 15, 2021 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / report of court questioning in Mexico | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: philgoddard United States | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Discussion entries: 4 | |
---|---|
the question legally deemed fit, the witness [or person being questioned] answered Explanation: Que diga el testigo […] Calificada de legal, contestó http://documentos.congresoqroo.gob.mx/historial/16_legislatu... the question legally deemed fit, the witness [or person being questioned] answered In other words, the question is allowed. Both the Crown Prosecutor and the Defence Counsel are allowed to ask questions of witnesses during the trial. They are presented in court by either the Crown or Defence in order to help prove their case/argument. Leading questions are not allowed during Direct Examination however they are permitted during the cross examination of a witness. https://schoolworkhelper.net/courtroom-procedures-questions-... Calificada de legal, el testigo responde https://www.proz.com/kudoz/spanish-to-english/law-contracts/... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2021-12-15 15:27:46 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- 'Calificada' is missing from the source text, but it is implied IMO -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2021-12-15 15:32:57 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Came to the same conclusion as in the discussion :) |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Pregunta Legal, Contestó Lawful line of questioning, s/he replied, Mex. Explanation: vs. improcedente > everybody else beat me to it .... Another alt. I had been looking into was 'answered on the record' > in the UK; made a formal admission. Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://forojuridico.mx/objecion-preguntas-proceso-penal/ |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Allowed. Reply: Explanation: I think this needs to be concise if it's repeated many times. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.