https://esl.proz.com/kudoz/spanish-to-english/law-general/5626819-abreviaci%C3%B3n-desconocida.html?paging=y
Aug 5, 2014 08:58
10 yrs ago
3 viewers *
español term

abreviación desconocida

español al inglés Jurídico/Patentes Derecho: (general) Int.no demandado
Hola, necesito ayuda para descifrar esta abreviación:

Int.no. demandado/Hartz. ez demand:.........(seguido por un nombre)


Esto viene en un documento legal de UPAD de 1ª Instancia Nº1 de Bergara
donde además de esta abreviación viene:

Demandante:
Procurador:
Demandado:
Procurador


Muchas gracias!
Proposed translations (inglés)
4 +3 non-defendant witness

Discussion

Tsvetana Valeva (asker) Aug 6, 2014:
I think I posted it correctly in the glossary :)
Tsvetana Valeva (asker) Aug 6, 2014:
Yep, sorry for this Lorena. How can I change it? I try to edit the entry but this particular part doesn´t appear to me..
lorenab23 Aug 5, 2014:
I would like to request that whoever posts this entry in the glossary (Richard Lackey/Tsvetilia) changes "abreviación desconocida" for Int. no demandado so other people can find it in the future.
Thank you :-)

Proposed translations

+3
55 minutos
español term (edited): Int. no demandado
Selected

non-defendant witness

From the Spanish "Interviniente no demandado", and I propose the following solution:
non-defendant witness

I think the second part is Basque, as shown in the second link below.
Note from asker:
thanks so much, Richard! Yep, the second part is Basque.
Peer comment(s):

agree Adrian MM. (X) : But a: Non-defendant intervener> a third-party with an interest who can join in the action, like the Solicitors' Regulation Authority/Law Society of England & Wales when a naughty Solicitor is being sued by clients or banks. ('The SRA intervening'...)
1 hora
Thanks Tom, yes that's a good point. I also thought of "non-defendant party"
agree philgoddard : I was confused by the full stop after "no", which I think must be a mistake. And Tom has a point, though "witness" is near enough.
3 horas
Thanks Phil, I agree that the full stop is probably a mistake and, in fact, does not appear in the second reference that I posted.
agree Rosa Paredes
18 horas
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thanks, Richard!"