translation contests »
Benevolent deception: "The placebo button effect" » English to Swahili

Competition in this pair is now closed, and the winning entry has been announced.

Discussion and feedback about the competition in this language pair may now be provided by visiting the "Discussion & feedback" page for this pair. Entries may also be individually discussed by clicking the "Discuss" link next to any listed entry.

Source text in English

Over the course of many years, without making any great fuss about it, the authorities in New York disabled most of the control buttons that once operated pedestrian-crossing lights in the city. Computerised timers, they had decided, almost always worked better. By 2004, fewer than 750 of 3,250 such buttons remained functional. The city government did not, however, take the disabled buttons away—beckoning countless fingers to futile pressing.

Initially, the buttons survived because of the cost of removing them. But it turned out that even inoperative buttons serve a purpose. Pedestrians who press a button are less likely to cross before the green man appears, says Tal Oron-Gilad of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, in Israel. Having studied behaviour at crossings, she notes that people more readily obey a system which purports to heed their input.

Inoperative buttons produce placebo effects of this sort because people like an impression of control over systems they are using, says Eytan Adar, an expert on human-computer interaction at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Dr Adar notes that his students commonly design software with a clickable “save” button that has no role other than to reassure those users who are unaware that their keystrokes are saved automatically anyway. Think of it, he says, as a touch of benevolent deception to counter the inherent coldness of the machine world.

That is one view. But, at road crossings at least, placebo buttons may also have a darker side. Ralf Risser, head of FACTUM, a Viennese institute that studies psychological factors in traffic systems, reckons that pedestrians’ awareness of their existence, and consequent resentment at the deception, now outweighs the benefits.

The winning entry has been announced in this pair.

There were 5 entries submitted in this pair during the submission phase. The winning entry was determined based on finals round voting by peers.

Competition in this pair is now closed.

Entries (5 total) Expand all entries

Filter entries
Language variants:
Entry #24874 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Kenyan
Voting points1st2nd3rd
6114 x42 x21 x1
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags
Entry #25274 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Kenyan
Voting points1st2nd3rd
182 x44 x22 x1
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags
Entry #24862 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
James Lue
James Lue
Voting points1st2nd3rd
111 x43 x21 x1
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags
Entry #25292 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Kenyan
Voting points1st2nd3rd
71 x41 x21 x1
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 1 "like" tag
watu hutii kwa urahisi utaratibu ambao unasemekana kufuata mchango wao.
Flows well
Entry #25591 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Voting points1st2nd3rd
41 x400
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags translation contests translation contests offer a fun way to take a break from your normal routine while testing and honing your skills with fellow translators. Translation Contests. Patent pending.

Your current localization setting


Select a language

All of
  • All of
  • Búsqueda de términos
  • Trabajos
  • Foros
  • Multiple search