GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
20:25 Aug 30, 2019 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Education / Pedagogy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Charles Davis Spain Local time: 00:59 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +5 | reviewers |
| ||
4 | referee / reviewer |
| ||
2 | (post-review) adjudicator |
|
reviewers Explanation: They are people to whom articles submitted to a journal for publication are sent for assessment of whether they should be accepted and what changes, if any, should be made. This is the peer review process. They may be members of the journal's editorial team but usually they aren't. They must be respected specialists in the field and usually their identity is not revealed to the author. The term "árbitros" is used in some places; "evaluadores" is a somewhat more common term for the same functiom. "Selección de Árbitros para una Revista de Corriente Principal: Un Asunto Ético [...[ Siguiendo con el tema del arbitraje de artículos enviados a revistas de corriente principal, comentado en un número anterior de esta revista, la selección de árbitros adecuados para revisar y evaluar un artículo representa siempre un problema no menor para los Editores." https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=... "Reviewers" is the most common term in English: "Becoming a reviewer: how and why Reviewing requires the investment of time and a certain skillset. Before you decide if you want to become a reviewer, we recommend that you read more about the peer review process and conducting a review." https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/reviewers/becoming-a-reviewer... "Journal Reviewers At Wiley we believe that peer review is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research." https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 36 mins (2019-08-30 21:02:17 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- It is not at all unusual for authors to acknowledge the comments of reviewers. When the system works well and the reviewers are competent and diligent, their comments can considerably improve the manuscript submitted. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 41 mins (2019-08-30 21:07:29 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- They can also be called referees, and this term used to be commonly used, at least in the UK, but my impression is that it's less common than it was a few decades ago. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||