GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16:46 Apr 20, 2009 |
Italian to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / claim | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Ivana UK United Kingdom Local time: 01:00 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | PIL |
| ||
1 | as above |
|
\"d.i.p.\" PIL Explanation: diritto internazionale privato private international law 13.12.1991 (in Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e ... cases should be given according to Reg. 44/2001 (see par. 9 of the ... www.ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/.../study_bxl1_compilation_qu... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 26 mins (2009-04-20 17:13:29 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Private international law (PIL) ... Conflicts of law - (PIL) Current Developments in Canadian Private International Law ... www.mcgill.ca/maritimelaw/conflicts |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
as above Explanation: "artt. 10 d.i.p. e 31": we are talking about two articles (artt. being the plural abbreviation) of the same Regulation, but the "d.i.p." bit only refers to article 10. I was wondering if they might be saying that article 10 had already been discussed (Discusso In Precedenza?) and they were just referring back to it. This is little more than a guess, based on noting that the acronym appears to apply to one article but not the other (if "diritto internazionale privato", wouldn't that apply to both articles?). |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.