GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00:27 Oct 7, 2014 |
German to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Patents / patent litigation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Kim Metzger Mexico Local time: 03:02 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | person held liable |
| ||
3 +1 | the person against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
person held liable Explanation: I don't specialize in patents, but here's what I'd suggest: dass der auf Vernichtung in Anspruch Genommene … Besitzer und/oder Eigentümer … der Schutzrechtsverletzenden Erzeugnisse ist that the person held liable for destruction is the owner and/or holder of the products that infringed proprietary rights |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
the person against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed Explanation: It is assumed that the person against whom the claim for revocation [of a patent] was filed was, at the time of the last oral hearing, a possessor and/or owner of the infringing products, according to the Civil Code. (Apparently there are two claims in this action. Party B has filed a claim for revocation of party A's patent, and moreover has filed another claim against A for infringement by A of a patent held by B.) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 01:56:07 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Alternatively: the party against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 02:01:02 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Alternatively: the party against which the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 13 hrs (2014-10-07 13:35:10 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- In light of Metzger comment: Vernichtung here evidently means destruction of the infringing products, not revocation of a patent. Therefore my answer is changed to: the person (or party) against whom (or which) the claim for destruction [of the infringing products] was filed. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.