GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17:32 Jun 14, 2005 |
German to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Law: Taxation & Customs | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Kieran McCann United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +3 | tainting |
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
Abfärbetheorie tainting Explanation: I don't know that this can be elevated to the status of a theory, and may need some re-wording, but the concept is the same Tainted Income Under the German Income Tax Act, all income received by a partnership that carries on a business activity (the German concept of being engaged in a trade or business) in addition to a non-business activity is deemed to be business income. That is, the business activity taints the whole partnership if the activity exceeds at least 1.25% of the overall activities of the partnership. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 56 mins (2005-06-14 18:28:26 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I think you could call it the \'tainting principle\', and it is quite a common term in tax matters when referring to earnings or assets which are deemed to qualify/not to qualify for various tax treatments in their entirety even though only a small proportion fall under some other relevant category Reference: http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_33061 |
| |
Grading comment
| ||