site coverage
German translation: Standortabdeckung
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 09:28 Mar 1, 2006 |
| English to German translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - IT (Information Technology) / Implementierung von Active Directory | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Rebekka Groß (X) Local time: 21:39 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 +2 | Standortabdeckung |
| ||
| 3 -1 | Verteilung der Besucherdichte |
|
| Discussion entries: 2 | |
|---|---|
Answers
27 mins confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +2
peer agreement (net): +2Standortabdeckung Explanation: Quelle für Übersetzung: http://www.ntsystems.de/advads.html und Windows 2003 Server-Glossar: "Automated Site Coverage by the DC Locator DNS SRV Records",,"""Automatisierte Standortabdeckung durch DC-Locator-DNS-SRV-Einträge" Automatic Site Coverage There is not necessarily a domain controller in every site. For various reasons, it is possible that no domain controller exists for a particular domain at the local site. By default, each domain controller checks all sites in the forest and then checks the replication cost matrix. A domain controller advertises itself (registers a site-related SRV record in DNS) in any site that does not have a domain controller for that domain and for which its site has the lowest-cost connections. This process ensures that every site has a domain controller that is defined by default for every domain in the forest, even if a site does not contain a domain controller for that domain. The domain controllers that are published in DNS are those from the closest site (as defined by the replication topology). For example, given one domain and three sites, a domain controller for that domain might be located in two of the sites, but there might be no domain controller for the domain in the third site. Replication to the domain that does not have a domain controller in the third site might be too expensive in terms of cost or replication latency. To ensure that a domain controller can be located in the site closest to a client computer, if not the same site, Windows 2000 automatically attempts to register a domain controller in every site. The algorithm that is used to accomplish automatic site coverage determines how one site can "cover" another site when no domain controller exists in the second site. Determining Site Coverage on the Basis of Cost Given one domain and sites A, B, and C, site A has no domain controllers for the domain. If a client in site A attempts to locate a domain controller, which domain controller should be returned? The answer depends on which site covers site A for the domain. Site coverage is determined according to site-link costs, and domain controllers register themselves in sites accordingly. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/200... Reference: http://www.ntsystems.de/advads.html |
| |||||||||||||
Grading comment
| ||||||||||||||
1 hr confidence: peer agreement (net): -1
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question. You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. KudoZ™ translation helpThe KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also: Search millions of term translations Your current localization setting
English
Select a language Close search
| ||||||||||||||
