GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
15:53 Aug 16, 2020 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Colombia | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: patinba Argentina Local time: 05:32 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
appeal file Explanation: I cannot find confirmation, but anything with "revisión" in the title usually refers to an appeal procedure |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Official note as result of the change of the law/ File as result of the change of the law Explanation: "Official note as result of the repeated checkup and the change of the law", or "File as result of the second review and the change of the law" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
review file Explanation: Definición Básica de Revisión De acuerdo con su autor, Guillermo Cabanellas de Torres, la definición de Revisión proporcionada por el Diccionario Jurídico Elemental es: Nueva consideración o examen. | Comprobación. | Registro. | Verificación de cuentas. | En las operaciones de reclutamiento, comprobación anual de las excepciones y exenciones temporales del servicio militar, luego de haber entrado los respectivos reclutas en caja. | Recurso extraordinario, para rectificar una sentencia firme, ante pruebas que revelan el error padecido. (V. RECURSO DE REVISIÓN.) https://diccionario.leyderecho.org/revision/#:~:text=Revisió... La revisión judicial (o control judicial, en inglés: judicial review) es un proceso bajo el cual las acciones ejecutivas y (en algunos países) legislativas están sujetas a revisión por parte de la judicatura. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revisión_judicial#:~:text=La r... What is judicial review? Judicial review is a kind of court case, in which someone (the “claimant”) challenges the lawfulness of a government decision. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/judicia... (4) In 2014 after correspondence with Home Secretary the 2009 Judicial Review file, against Kent Chief constable that was stolen from Royal Courts of Justice, turned up at the Royal Courts of Justice one copy missing. If you check back through FOIs you will find I questioned you about which report you cited. It is looking increasingly as if you had the copy of judicial review file that we now know is missing from the RCJ bundle. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/case_reviews_deal_bar... |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
2 hrs confidence:
|
56 mins |
Reference Reference information: I think yes, you’re right: Cabe aclarar que los documentos presentados en estos cuadernos no se han sometido a la revisión editorial que el CEMLA aplica a sus publicaciones. https://www.cemla.org/PDF/cuadernos/pub-ci-53.pdf |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.